\[ \require{mathtools} \require{bussproofs} \newcommand{\Unit}{\mathbf{1}} \newcommand{\Cut}[3]{\langle\, #1 \,\Vert_{{}_{#3}}\, #2 \,\rangle} \newcommand{\judgeMem}[3]{#1 \ni #2 : #3} \newcommand{\judgeCmd}[3]{#1 : (#2 \vdash #3)} \newcommand{\judgeVal}[4]{#1 \vdash_v #2 : #3 \mid #4} \newcommand{\judgeTm}[4]{#1 \vdash_t #2 : #3 \mid #4} \newcommand{\judgeCtx}[4]{#1 \mid #2 : #3 \vdash_e #4} \newcommand{\judgeWk}[2]{#1 \sqsupseteq #2} \newcommand{\judgeSub}[4]{(#1 \vdash #2 : #3) \vdash #4} \newcommand{\judgeCoSub}[4]{#1 \vdash (#4 \vdash #2 : #3)} \newcommand{\Subst}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle} \newcommand{\eqVal}[5]{#1 \vdash_v #2 \approx #3 : #4 \mid #5} \newcommand{\eqTm}[5]{#1 \vdash_t #2 \approx #3 : #4 \mid #5} \newcommand{\eqCtx}[5]{#1 \mid #2 \approx #3 : #4 \vdash_e #5} \newcommand{\eqCmd}[4]{#1 \approx #2 : (#3 \vdash #4)} \newcommand{\SN}{\mathsf{SN}} \newcommand{\Red}[2]{\mathrm{Red}_{#1}(#2)} \newcommand{\CoRed}[2]{\mathrm{CoRed}_{#1}(#2)} \newcommand{\RedSub}[1]{\mathrm{RedSub}(#1)} \newcommand{\CoRedSub}[1]{\mathrm{CoRedSub}(#1)} \]
This is a fine-grained presentation of call-by-value System L.
Syntax
Definition 1 (Types). \[ A, B \Coloneqq \bot \mid \Unit \mid A \times B \mid A \to B \mid A + B \] \[ \neg A \coloneqq A \to \bot \]
Definition 2 (Contexts). \[ \Gamma, \Delta \Coloneqq \cdot \mid \Gamma, x{:}A \] \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{} \RightLabel{z} \UnaryInfC{$\judgeMem{\Gamma, x{:}A}{x}{A}$} \end{prooftree} \qquad \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeMem{\Gamma}{x}{A}$} \RightLabel{s} \UnaryInfC{$\judgeMem{\Gamma, y{:}B}{x}{A}$} \end{prooftree} \]
Definition 3 (Judgements). \[ \text{commands} \quad \judgeCmd{\tau}{\Gamma}{\Delta} \qquad \text{values} \quad \judgeVal{\Gamma}{V}{A}{\Delta} \qquad \text{terms} \quad \judgeTm{\Gamma}{M}{A}{\Delta} \qquad \text{coterms} \quad \judgeCtx{\Gamma}{C}{A}{\Delta} \]
Definition 4 (Commands). \[ \tau \Coloneqq \Cut{M}{C}{A} \] \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeTm{\Gamma}{M}{A}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{C}{A}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{cut} \BinaryInfC{$\judgeCmd{\Cut{M}{C}{A}}{\Gamma}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \]
Definition 5 (Values). \[ V, W \Coloneqq x \mid \lambda x.\, M \mid \langle\rangle \mid (V, W) \mid \mathsf{inl}(V) \mid \mathsf{inr}(W) \] \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeMem{\Gamma}{x}{A}$} \RightLabel{var} \UnaryInfC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{x}{A}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \qquad \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeTm{\Gamma, x{:}A}{M}{B}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{lam} \UnaryInfC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{\lambda x.\, M}{A \to B}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \] \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{} \RightLabel{unit} \UnaryInfC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{\langle\rangle}{\Unit}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \qquad \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{V}{A}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{W}{B}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{pair} \BinaryInfC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{(V, W)}{A \times B}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \] \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{V}{A}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{inl} \UnaryInfC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{\mathsf{inl}(V)}{A + B}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \qquad \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{W}{B}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{inr} \UnaryInfC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{\mathsf{inr}(W)}{A + B}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \]
Definition 6 (Terms). \[ M, N \Coloneqq \mathsf{ret}(V) \mid \mu\alpha.\, \tau \] \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{V}{A}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{ret} \UnaryInfC{$\judgeTm{\Gamma}{\mathsf{ret}(V)}{A}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \qquad \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeCmd{\tau}{\Gamma}{\Delta, \alpha{:}A}$} \RightLabel{$\mu$} \UnaryInfC{$\judgeTm{\Gamma}{\mu\alpha.\, \tau}{A}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \]
Definition 7 (Coterms). \[ C \Coloneqq \alpha \mid V \cdot C \mid \mathsf{fst}(C) \mid \mathsf{snd}(C) \mid \mathsf{case}(C_1, C_2) \mid \tilde\mu x.\, \tau \mid \mathsf{tp} \] \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeMem{\Delta}{\alpha}{A}$} \RightLabel{covar} \UnaryInfC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{\alpha}{A}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \qquad \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{V}{A}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{C}{B}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{app} \BinaryInfC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{V \cdot C}{A \to B}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \] \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{C}{A}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{fst} \UnaryInfC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{\mathsf{fst}(C)}{A \times B}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \qquad \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{C}{B}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{snd} \UnaryInfC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{\mathsf{snd}(C)}{A \times B}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \] \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{C_1}{A}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{C_2}{B}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{case} \BinaryInfC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{\mathsf{case}(C_1, C_2)}{A + B}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \qquad \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeCmd{\tau}{\Gamma, x{:}A}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{$\tilde\mu$} \UnaryInfC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{\tilde\mu x.\, \tau}{A}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \] \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{} \RightLabel{tp} \UnaryInfC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{\mathsf{tp}}{\bot}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \]
Weakening & Substitution
Definition 8 (Weakening). \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{} \RightLabel{$\mathsf{wk}_\cdot$} \UnaryInfC{$\judgeWk{\cdot}{\cdot}$} \end{prooftree} \qquad \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeWk{\Gamma}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{$\mathsf{wk}_{\mathsf{cong}}$} \UnaryInfC{$\judgeWk{\Gamma, x{:}A}{\Delta, x{:}A}$} \end{prooftree} \qquad \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeWk{\Gamma}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{$\mathsf{wk}_{\mathsf{wk}}$} \UnaryInfC{$\judgeWk{\Gamma, x{:}A}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \]
Lemma 1 (Weakening). Given \(\judgeWk{\Gamma}{\Gamma'}\) and \(\judgeWk{\Delta}{\Delta'}\), the following rules are admissible: \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeWk{\Gamma}{\Gamma'}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeWk{\Delta}{\Delta'}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma'}{V}{A}{\Delta'}$} \RightLabel{wk-val} \TrinaryInfC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{V}{A}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \qquad \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeWk{\Gamma}{\Gamma'}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeWk{\Delta}{\Delta'}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeTm{\Gamma'}{M}{A}{\Delta'}$} \RightLabel{wk-tm} \TrinaryInfC{$\judgeTm{\Gamma}{M}{A}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \] \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeWk{\Gamma}{\Gamma'}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeWk{\Delta}{\Delta'}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma'}{C}{A}{\Delta'}$} \RightLabel{wk-ctx} \TrinaryInfC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{C}{A}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \qquad \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeWk{\Gamma}{\Gamma'}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeWk{\Delta}{\Delta'}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeCmd{\tau}{\Gamma'}{\Delta'}$} \RightLabel{wk-cmd} \TrinaryInfC{$\judgeCmd{\tau}{\Gamma}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \]
Definition 9 (Substitution). \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{} \RightLabel{$\Gamma$-$\langle\rangle$} \UnaryInfC{$\judgeSub{\Gamma}{\langle\rangle}{\cdot}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \qquad \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeSub{\Gamma}{\theta}{\Gamma'}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{V}{A}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{$\Gamma$-ext} \BinaryInfC{$\judgeSub{\Gamma}{\Subst{\theta}{V/x}}{\Gamma', x{:}A}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \] \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{} \RightLabel{$\Gamma$-$\langle\rangle$} \UnaryInfC{$\judgeCoSub{\Gamma}{\langle\rangle}{\cdot}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \qquad \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeCoSub{\Gamma}{\varphi}{\Delta'}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{C}{A}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{$\Gamma$-ext} \BinaryInfC{$\judgeCoSub{\Gamma}{\Subst{\varphi}{C/\alpha}}{\Delta', \alpha{:}A}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \]
Lemma 2 (Substitution). Given \(\judgeSub{\Gamma}{\theta}{\Gamma'}{\Delta}\) and \(\judgeCoSub{\Gamma}{\varphi}{\Delta'}{\Delta}\), the substitution pair \((\theta, \varphi)\) has admissible substitution rules: \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeSub{\Gamma}{\theta}{\Gamma'}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeCoSub{\Gamma}{\varphi}{\Delta'}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma'}{V}{A}{\Delta'}$} \RightLabel{sub-val} \TrinaryInfC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{V[\theta;\varphi]}{A}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \qquad \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeSub{\Gamma}{\theta}{\Gamma'}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeCoSub{\Gamma}{\varphi}{\Delta'}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeTm{\Gamma'}{M}{A}{\Delta'}$} \RightLabel{sub-tm} \TrinaryInfC{$\judgeTm{\Gamma}{M[\theta;\varphi]}{A}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \] \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeSub{\Gamma}{\theta}{\Gamma'}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeCoSub{\Gamma}{\varphi}{\Delta'}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma'}{C}{A}{\Delta'}$} \RightLabel{sub-ctx} \TrinaryInfC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{C[\theta;\varphi]}{A}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \qquad \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeSub{\Gamma}{\theta}{\Gamma'}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeCoSub{\Gamma}{\varphi}{\Delta'}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeCmd{\tau}{\Gamma'}{\Delta'}$} \RightLabel{sub-cmd} \TrinaryInfC{$\judgeCmd{\tau[\theta;\varphi]}{\Gamma}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \]
Equational Theory
Definition 10 (Let Bindings). \[ \begin{aligned} \mathsf{let}\ x = V; M &\coloneqq \Cut{\mathsf{ret}(V)}{\tilde\mu x.\, \Cut{M}{\alpha}{B}}{A} \\ \mathsf{let}\ x = N; M &\coloneqq \mu\alpha.\, \Cut{N}{\tilde\mu x.\, \Cut{M}{\alpha}{B}}{A} \\ \mathsf{let}\ C\ \mathsf{be}\ \alpha; \tau &\coloneqq \Cut{\mu\alpha.\, \tau}{C}{A} \end{aligned} \]
Definition 11 (Equational Theory). Each judgement has an equivalence relation and congruence for every formation rule in Definition 4, Definition 5, Definition 6, Definition 7.
Eta. \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{V}{\Unit}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{unit-eta} \UnaryInfC{$\eqVal{\Gamma}{V}{\langle\rangle}{\Unit}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \qquad \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeTm{\Gamma}{M}{A}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{$\mu$-eta} \UnaryInfC{$\eqTm{\Gamma}{M}{\mu\alpha.\, \Cut{M}{\alpha}{A}}{A}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \] \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{C}{A}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{$\tilde\mu$-eta} \UnaryInfC{$\eqCtx{\Gamma}{C}{\tilde\mu x.\, \Cut{x}{C}{A}}{A}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \]
Beta (cut elimination). \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeCmd{\tau}{\Gamma}{\Delta, \alpha{:}A}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{C}{A}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{$\mu$-beta} \BinaryInfC{$\eqCmd{\Cut{\mu\alpha.\, \tau}{C}{A}}{\tau[C/\alpha]}{\Gamma}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \qquad \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{V}{A}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeCmd{\tau}{\Gamma, x{:}A}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{$\tilde\mu$-beta} \BinaryInfC{$\eqCmd{\Cut{\mathsf{ret}(V)}{\tilde\mu x.\, \tau}{A}}{\tau[V/x]}{\Gamma}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \] \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeTm{\Gamma, x{:}A}{M}{B}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{V}{A}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{C}{B}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{app-beta} \TrinaryInfC{$\eqCmd{\Cut{\lambda x.\, M}{V \cdot C}{A \to B}}{\Cut{M[V/x]}{C}{B}}{\Gamma}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \] \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{V}{A}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{W}{B}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{C}{A}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{fst-beta} \TrinaryInfC{$\eqCmd{\Cut{(V, W)}{\mathsf{fst}(C)}{A \times B}}{\Cut{V}{C}{A}}{\Gamma}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \qquad \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{V}{A}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{W}{B}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{C}{B}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{snd-beta} \TrinaryInfC{$\eqCmd{\Cut{(V, W)}{\mathsf{snd}(C)}{A \times B}}{\Cut{W}{C}{B}}{\Gamma}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \] \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{V}{A}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{C_1}{A}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{C_2}{B}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{inl-beta} \TrinaryInfC{$\eqCmd{\Cut{\mathsf{inl}(V)}{\mathsf{case}(C_1, C_2)}{A + B}}{\Cut{V}{C_1}{A}}{\Gamma}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \qquad \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\judgeVal{\Gamma}{W}{B}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{C_1}{A}{\Delta}$} \AxiomC{$\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{C_2}{B}{\Delta}$} \RightLabel{inr-beta} \TrinaryInfC{$\eqCmd{\Cut{\mathsf{inr}(W)}{\mathsf{case}(C_1, C_2)}{A + B}}{\Cut{W}{C_2}{B}}{\Gamma}{\Delta}$} \end{prooftree} \]
Strong Normalisation
We show strong normalisation by reducibility candidates.
Definition 12 (Reduction). We orient the beta equations of Definition 11 left-to-right to define a type-preserving one-step reduction relation \(\tau \mapsto \tau'\) on commands.
Definition 13 (Strong Normalisation). \[ \begin{prooftree} \AxiomC{$\forall \tau'.\ \tau \mapsto \tau' \to \SN(\tau')$} \RightLabel{sn} \UnaryInfC{$\SN(\tau)$} \end{prooftree} \]
Definition 14 (Reducibility Candidates). By induction on \(A\), mutually define \(\Red{A}{V}\) for \(\judgeVal{\Gamma}{V}{A}{\Delta}\), and \(\CoRed{A}{C}\) for \(\judgeCtx{\Gamma}{C}{A}{\Delta}\): \[ \begin{aligned} \Red{\bot}{V} &\coloneqq \top & \Red{\Unit}{V} &\coloneqq \top \\ \Red{A \times B}{x} &\coloneqq \top & \Red{A \times B}{(V, W)} &\coloneqq \Red{A}{V} \times \Red{B}{W} \\ \Red{A + B}{x} &\coloneqq \top & \Red{A + B}{\mathsf{inl}(V)} &\coloneqq \Red{A}{V} \qquad \Red{A + B}{\mathsf{inr}(W)} \coloneqq \Red{B}{W} \\ \Red{A \to B}{x} &\coloneqq \top \end{aligned} \] \[ \Red{A \to B}{\lambda x.\, M} \coloneqq \forall\, \judgeWk{\Gamma'}{\Gamma},\, \judgeWk{\Delta'}{\Delta},\, \judgeVal{\Gamma'}{W}{A}{\Delta'},\, \judgeCtx{\Gamma'}{C}{B}{\Delta'}.\ \Red{A}{W} \to \CoRed{B}{C} \to \SN(\Cut{M[W/x]}{C}{B}) \] \[ \begin{aligned} \CoRed{A}{\alpha} &\coloneqq \top & \CoRed{\bot}{\mathsf{tp}} &\coloneqq \top \\ \CoRed{A \times B}{\mathsf{fst}(C)} &\coloneqq \CoRed{A}{C} & \CoRed{A \times B}{\mathsf{snd}(C)} &\coloneqq \CoRed{B}{C} \\ \CoRed{A + B}{\mathsf{case}(C_1, C_2)} &\coloneqq \CoRed{A}{C_1} \times \CoRed{B}{C_2} & \CoRed{A \to B}{V \cdot C} &\coloneqq \Red{A}{V} \times \CoRed{B}{C} \end{aligned} \] \[ \CoRed{A}{\tilde\mu x.\, \tau} \coloneqq \forall\, \judgeWk{\Gamma'}{\Gamma},\, \judgeWk{\Delta'}{\Delta},\, \judgeVal{\Gamma'}{V}{A}{\Delta'}.\ \Red{A}{V} \to \SN(\tau[V/x]) \]
Lemma 3 (Reducibility is Stable Under Weakening). Given \(\judgeWk{\Gamma}{\Gamma'}\) and \(\judgeWk{\Delta}{\Delta'}\): if \(\Red{A}{V}\) at \((\Gamma', \Delta')\) then \(\Red{A}{V}\) at \((\Gamma, \Delta)\); dually, if \(\CoRed{A}{C}\) at \((\Gamma', \Delta')\) then \(\CoRed{A}{C}\) at \((\Gamma, \Delta)\).
Lemma 4 (Orthogonality). If \(\Red{A}{V}\) and \(\CoRed{A}{C}\), then \(\SN(\Cut{\mathsf{ret}(V)}{C}{A})\).
Definition 15 (Reducible Substitutions). For \(\judgeSub{\Gamma}{\theta}{\Gamma'}{\Delta}\) and \(\judgeCoSub{\Gamma}{\varphi}{\Delta'}{\Delta}\): \[ \RedSub{\theta} \coloneqq \forall\, x{:}A \in \Gamma'.\ \Red{A}{\theta(x)} \qquad \CoRedSub{\varphi} \coloneqq \forall\, \alpha{:}A \in \Delta'.\ \CoRed{A}{\varphi(\alpha)} \]
Lemma 5 (Reducible Substitutions are Stable and Extendable). \(\RedSub{-}\) and \(\CoRedSub{-}\) are stable under weakening; and if \(\RedSub{\theta}\), \(\Red{A}{V}\), then \(\RedSub{\Subst{\theta}{V/x}}\), and dually for \(\CoRedSub{-}\) and \(\Subst{\varphi}{C/\alpha}\).
Theorem 1 (Fundamental Lemma). Given \(\judgeSub{\Gamma}{\theta}{\Gamma'}{\Delta}\), \(\judgeCoSub{\Gamma}{\varphi}{\Delta'}{\Delta}\) with \(\RedSub{\theta}\) and \(\CoRedSub{\varphi}\):
- if \(\judgeVal{\Gamma'}{V}{A}{\Delta'}\), then \(\Red{A}{V[\theta;\varphi]}\);
- if \(\judgeTm{\Gamma'}{M}{A}{\Delta'}\), then for every \(\CoRed{A}{C}\), \(\SN(\Cut{M[\theta;\varphi]}{C}{A})\);
- if \(\judgeCtx{\Gamma'}{C}{A}{\Delta'}\), then \(\CoRed{A}{C[\theta;\varphi]}\);
- if \(\judgeCmd{\tau}{\Gamma'}{\Delta'}\), then \(\SN(\tau[\theta;\varphi])\).
Theorem 2 (Strong Normalisation). For every \(\judgeCmd{\tau}{\Gamma}{\Delta}\), \(\SN(\tau)\).
Definition 16 (Normal Forms). \(\mathsf{Normal}(\tau) \coloneqq \nexists \tau'.\ \tau \mapsto \tau'\), and \(\tau \twoheadrightarrow \tau'\) is the reflexive-transitive closure of \(\mapsto\).
Theorem 3 (Progress). For every command \(\tau\): either \(\mathsf{Normal}(\tau)\), or \(\tau \mapsto \tau'\) for some \(\tau'\).
Theorem 4 (Normalisation). For every \(\judgeCmd{\tau}{\Gamma}{\Delta}\), there exists \(\tau'\) with \(\tau \twoheadrightarrow \tau'\) and \(\mathsf{Normal}(\tau')\).
Citation
@online{choudhury2026,
author = {Choudhury, Vikraman},
title = {System {L}},
date = {2026-07-21},
url = {https://vikraman.org/notes/system-l.html},
langid = {en}
}